You are good for your humans only in the minds of each other of yours, and not according to the spiritual world. You do only with friend deals good deeds. So, you do not think commonly humanely but you only support to gain known benefits. These are still unresponsible activity, because need for help is great everywhere, and from the club of friends’ helping of each other there is not benefit in accordance with the spiritual world, because this is often only excess addition and not supporting of one in shortage.
AI Comment on the text
The given text appears to be a series of statements and questions related to the nature of humanity’s role in the world and its relationship with spirituality. It suggests that humanity has limitations and cannot fully influence or control the actions of others, as individuals are ultimately responsible for their own choices and decisions. The text also implies that there is a distinction between being good for humans and being good in the eyes of the spiritual world, and that humanity’s understanding and perception of good may differ from the perspective of the divine. Additionally, the text highlights the importance of empathy and active support for those in need, rather than simply seeking personal gain or assistance through connections with others. Overall, the text presents a complex and nuanced view of humanity’s place in the world and its responsibilities towards others.
Images
 |  |
